First, let me agree that I think I'm a woman. I want that to be clear.

But, taking a cold, hard look at data like this, I still think there's room for interpretation. For example, I think your actual position here is that trans brain function makes us so much like cis women that it overwhelms any objections to categorizing us as women. That's not data, it's interpretation of data -- and interpretation is something projected onto data; it doesn't arise spontaneously from the data itself.

This is a philosophical point about the nature of science and its relationship to truth. It is often ignored. Most people forget that, at its heart, science is philosophy.

Brava, regarding the painting! I searched for it online without success; now I know why. I was thinking of buying it -- well, a print, anyway. I love it.